Re: [2] some Q's for rocktropolis transcript

[anthonyr]

j.BOLt SThAR eNYCh wrote:
> 
> Surely babel-list needs a Resident Fool?
>                              But then, I like that job Myself.


Well said! And to quote TonyR, 'Nuff said!


> 
> I find mr.ed's Invective no more Exciting than his alledged
> "ideas" - but then, We haven't seen any of those yet, have We?


The JBOLT "WE" count is now at two.


> As for sonic5's - and others - "freedom of speech" issues, I
> dunno; mr.ed Seems more like a Drunk Disturbing the Peace (and
> telling us to "get used to it"). I don't really see it as a
> "Free Speech" issue; But I don't much care, I'll leave it up
> to Michael.
> 

So you "dunno" and you "don't much care" about freedom of speech. Or,
apparently, fairness. I knew all of that already.


> IF Abuse and Invective are OK, then I'll deal with it as and
> how I see Fit. 

Well, since you are the principal source of abuse and invective on this
list from way back (long before Ed joined the list), then you should
know how to deal with it when it comes your way (as it always does). Be
careful, though, you may find youself unsubbed if you deal with it as
you see fit. But I'll leave that to Michael, too.

> So. A Proposal; An Experiment: We Can Get Rid of mr.ed at any
> time if He gets *Too* Bad, so let's Just give him a Try
> - Give him Laisser Faire - let's See How Badly Noise Degrades
> the Channel. If, after 30 days, We Can Still Communicate, then
> He Doesn't Matter at All.

The "WE" count goes way up to 6! 

My counter-experiment/proposal/deep-felt request would be to see if you
can stop using the word "We" or "Us". You don't speak for anyone but
yourself!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can you (we) understand that?


> ** Still, We still Don't really Know if She read it or Not.
>    What We*Do* Know is that She Refused to be Interviewed for
>    It, or Contribute to it.


You're not listening. Now it's up to 8.


>               Thing is, Patti doesn't have to read them, She
>               Speaks to them. Then they Publish and (Some of Us)
>               can read them and be fairly sure that She really
>               said something like that.


Finally ending at nine "we"s and "us"es. So my question to JBolt is, who
are the "WE" you keep referring to in all your posts (not just this
one)? Certainly not the clique that Ed was mentioning awhile back, I'm
sure.

You know, my feeling is that the "We" you keep referring to are all
those voices in your head, leading me to believe that you are off your
medication. Which explains a whole lot to me. (That would also explain
the pathologically excessive use of Capitalizations and *ASTERISKS*!)

So thanks to you, JBolt, and almost exclusively to you, you have pretty
much destroyed this mailing list, IN MY HUMBLE OPINION. Unlike you, I
can only speak for myself. But I'm sorry you have destroyed the list
with your hatred and ignorance, because you also have so much to give to
the mailing list in an affirmative and positive sense. Much more than
me, for instance. It's a tragedy that someone with such great attributes
can also have such great flaws. But my question is, will you please try
and stop? As long as Ed remains, you will continue to needle and insult
and demean him, and he will continue to do the same to you, in
retaliation. Ad infinitum. This reminds me of the old Star Trek episode
with the men with half white/half black faces. And we all (oops, sorry)
know how that turned out.

 
> --//
> eLTyger
> --//
> /*NO RESPECT FOR PEOPLE OR THEIR IDEA(S)*/
> --//