Patti Smith Mailing List archives
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: shmuck explained
- To: babel-list
- Subject: Re: shmuck explained
- From: anthonyr
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 1998 03:00:17 -0500
- References: <199802040400.XAA18864>
- Reply-To: babel-list
- Sender: owner-babel-list
Ed Ezergailis wrote:
>
> Re:. But what's a "shmuck"? :)
> >
> > Its a horse's penis. I think its Yiddish...but I'm not sure of that.
>
> Yup. See it was kind of funny to me. Horse's as in "HORSES" but horses'
> penis (penises?) as in JBolt critiquing me for "speaking for Patti" while
> doing the exact same thing (backed only by a website - which is trendy but
> unconvincing). Therein implied that he gave Patti the patriarchal weaponry
> he felt she was lacking. Pretty funny "invective" if you ask me - but of
> course you didn't.
>
I don't for a minute believe you used the word to mean 'horse's penis'
as some witty wordplay on HORSES. Nice try, though.
> Mary or Fiona (they seem so interchangeable)
If you believe that, you definitely haven't been here long enough!
> recommended therapy or
> spiritual guidance. Herein I rest my case (for now) on hippie vs. punk. If
> you don't get this, you prove it even further.
I got it. They're really hippies, and you're a punk. No argument there.
But then, Patti Smith doesn't seem like much of a punk, either,
nowadays. Was she ever, then, by that distinction? (The distinction
being, if you show signs of hippieness, you can't be a punk.) Are
Hippies and Punks mutually exculsive? I didn't know that. Please explain
again.
> but JBolt just got me laughing so hard with how meticulously
> he tried to dissect my post which did feature "proof". Checking the times,
> he spent hours on it! Had to do it in two parts no less. I left one quote
> out of what maybe 7 (I didn't count) unreferenced and sure enough in came
> the "where's your proof Ed?" Ya gotta admire that kind of dedication.
So, you see, you and JBolt have ALOT in common. (Dedication.)
> back to Mary and/or Fiona.........
>
> If this was the 60s, you'd both be good hippies.
>
That's the nicest thing you've said so far. Was that supposed to be a
put-down?
> You could all get together and chant away
> those evil karmas of shmucks like me.
So ... you include yourself as a schmuck, along with JBolt. The truth
is, I think one of you is probably a horse's penis and the other is a
horse's ass. Maybe you two can use that fact as a way of getting to
know each other better. Just a suggestion. :-)
> Power to the people, man!
>
As Monty Python would say, "Is this Abuse? No, that's down the hall.
This is Sarcasm."