Re: [3] apologies for comments on 'punk'

["j.BOLt SThAR eNYCh" <eltyger>]

0059 EST // Sun 01 Feb 98 // BklnNYC
                                   
Well You Can't kill those lower-70s glam bands *too*
Abruptly - Precipitating Sugar-Shock - so there had to be a 
Transitional Form...
And, uh...
                        
Ahem.
                        
***************************************************************
>From: "BlackMonk (Tom,as always)" <blackmonk>
>To: <babel-list>
>Subject: Re: [2] apologies for comments on 'punk'
>Date: Sun, 1 Feb 1998 14:45:13 -0500
                                       
...
                              
>>         Lenny for sure, and I think Patti as well, have
>>         Never been quite as "Anti-Hippy" as some folx
>>         would like (I will say IMO, to avoid having to
>>         Cite References. I think this Info is well known.).
>>
>Doesn anyone  else find the pictures on the back of Horses 
>as funny as I do? This Beat-influenced, Proto-Punk poets was 
>fronting a band of long haired pretty boys, any one of whom 
>could have come in second to David Cassidy at the Partridge 
>Family auditions a few years earlier.
                                       
        ** Did She Know How to Pick 'em, or Whot?
                                              
***************************************************************
                                   
--//
eLTyger
--//
/*RESPECT FOR THE ELECTRON(S)*/
--//
/*SACRED LIGHTNING/ DANCE THE WORLD*/