Re: Here comes the EGO-MANiac again - Ralph's baaaaaaaaaaaaaack!!!!

[geomakla]

 Mitch,
??? I found your reply quite polite enough...? we just disagree, in the shade of hindsight.? There were other third party candidates that got far more than 500 votes ( whether those votes were legally counted or not...at this stage...they appear to have all been counted?).? And as Gore adopted Nader's points, he picked up votes?? How do we really pin this down, as fault?? 

Mark in St. Louis


 


Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good you'll have to ram them down people's throats.--Howard Aiken


 


 

-----Original Message-----
From: Gart, Mitchell <Mitchell.Gart>
To: geomakla; babel-list
Sent: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 1:48 pm
Subject: RE: Here comes the EGO-MANiac again - Ralph's  baaaaaaaaaaaaaack!!!!















Sorry to not be polite on the list but ...


?


It takes an idiot to blame "new math" for Nader taking the votes that elected Bush over Gore in 2000.? Nader took those votes.? Bush won Florida by 500 votes and Nader got 97000 votes in Florida.? If at the last minute Nader had bowed out and asked his supporters to please vote for Gore, who would have gotten those votes?


?


None of us knew just how bad Bush would be, but Nadir let us all find out.


?


- Mitch















 


________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://webmail.aol.com