RE: Possunt quia posse videntur - redux (NPC)

["Dennis Moore" <clayboy56>]

Gleena posited "...does it include emailing links with a description?? If
so, we're all in alot of trouble!!!!"

Again, I'm as bad as anyone and would [previously] not hesitate to provide
the community of information I thought was valuable, of interest, whatever,
and Patti relevant.

To repeat, because I don't want my main point to get lost, what I will be
more conscientious of is where that link takes someone/comes from and how
that party is behaving. Astro.com was a particularly manipulative, insidious
and extensive violation, and not of just Patti's intellectual property. I'm
not saying whoever was responsible is not "into Patti." Maybe they were
"wanting to share" what they had done even. Ultimately it became traffic for
the site.

It will involve splitting hairs for the future. Perhaps I will talk about
things more generally and assume the reader is intelligent to find "it" on
his or her own if I provide enough key words, say, with my referencing to
something. Perhaps I'll post less of that sort of message.

Always,
Dennis

Now my brain hurts - I will be thinking about how this impacts my feelings
and behavior with respect to file-sharing, bootlegs, etc. "Mmmmmmm.... (in
my best Marge voice)