grainy-redundant
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bomp] Response to various uniform code citations
Steve,
I think you are over-thinking this. I have cool beatle boots which at some
times or places may be less cool in relation to others. Nevertheless they
are pretty cool footwear by my own admittedly biased standards. I don't
think you can objectively and absolutely label something like a uniform as
always uncool by definition. Guess it's all in the mynd's eye of the
beholder.
Blind Lemon Squirrel.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Immortal Porpoises" <immortalporpoises@earthlink.net>
To: <bomp@xnet2.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 2:00 PM
Subject: [bomp] Response to various uniform code citations
> In my opinion, largely formed by a 27 year career performing and enjoying
> the performances of others in which outfits may or may not have matched, a
> band wearing either matching or complementary outfits is in the same
> category as rehearsing and performing matching and/or complementary music
on
> their repsective instruments to create the ensemble sound that is the
band's
> individual craft. In other words, a band like Devo or the Beatles
outfitting
> themselves as a unit is indistinguishable from individuals assembling
their
> own public face. So it can be considered cool (depending on the results,
of
> course), but by my standard doesn't really constitute wearing a "uniform,"
> which I maintain connotes uncoolness by its very being.
===> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe bomp" to majordomo@xnet2.com <===