RE: [bomp] Re: definitely what the fuck

["Vince Welsh" <vince@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I admit that Oasis is goofy, and while the whole comparison to the Beatles
thing that followed them around during the mid-90's was pure hype, I've
heard many, many bands on the radio that suck worse.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bomp@xnet2.com [mailto:owner-bomp@xnet2.com] On Behalf Of Brock
>From The Grave
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 1:16 AM
To: bomp@xnet2.com
Subject: Re: [bomp] Re: definitely what the fuck


I'd agree that rock n roll is often at its best when it's cheap shit (The 
Mummies, Supercharger and bands of that ilk are examples). But there's cheap

shit and then there's garbage. Oasis is garbage- plain and simple. If I 
stepped in something on the sidewalk that stunk as bad as Oasis, I'd burn my

shoes. No redeeming qualities to that crap at all and being over-hyped has 
nothing to do with them being shite. And you'd have to be stretching the 
definition of rock n roll to the breaking point to include Oasis.

> Point well taken. On the other hand, sometimes rock 'n' roll is at its 
> best
> when it's cheap shit.
>> Oasis is a cool band, just over-hyped in the music
> press.
>
> Oasis make lowest common denominator indie rock music.
> But the worst thing about their popularity over here
> is how they've spawned a thousand and one imitators.

===> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe bomp" to majordomo@xnet2.com <===

-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.1/355 - Release Date: 6/2/2006
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.1/355 - Release Date: 6/2/2006

===> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe bomp" to majordomo@xnet2.com <===