grainy-redundant
Bomp List archives  

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bomp] The Decline(?) Of The Bomp List




On Tuesday, March 07, 2006, at 01:32PM, <rsmccull@planetkc.com> wrote:

>
>that's a much more plausible explanation than the theory of a once-robust
>list being brought to its knees by one crank poster.  he wasn't even the
>most annoying one (just the most persistent).
>
>re-name the list? forgive the corporate speak, but 'bomp' is a valuable
>brand name.  why throw it away?

Well... Umm... One can only use a brand name owned by another if they give permission.  According to another post, Suzy's given her permission, w/certain restrictions.  So, either we honor those restrictions and keep the name, or just change the name.  Of course, if we find out she'd be happier if we just changed the name, I think it would be nice to accede to her wishes.

===> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe bomp" to majordomo@xnet2.com <===